Marg Sauce Labs

Their support was in-depth and quite knowledgeable. Hypothetically, they have great coverage of different browsers and operating systems ... if you can get your tests to run.

We were never able to get our parallel, multi-browser Selenium test suite to run and pass after weeks. I had been warned that Sauce Labs could be hit or miss by multiple people who had used it for a few years, and they were correct. In the end, our support contact concluded they had some additional work to do on their side to be able to accommodate us (even though we were using all off-the-shelf gems and frameworks.

Sauce Labs is definitely worth a try -- it may just work with your existing Selenium suites. if you have a spare week to work with their support, they might get it to work consistently for you. Their support was great, despite their service's inability to run our suites consistently.

We wanted to run our tests on multiple browser versions, across multiple operating systems. We were using some advanced CSS, JavaScript, and polyfills, so getting continuous test coverage was critical for our small team. We never saw it work consistently in Sauce.

I like the Tunneling. Also, it is good for manual testing. .

Automated test fail randomly. Need scripts to rerun failed tests.

E2E testing for web applications.

The ability to (eventually run your test suite through all the browsers that you need to support.

We have found that tests will fail due to timeouts with the tunnel connection, or other internal saucelabs issues. Usually re-running the tests will work, but because of this, we can't use it to fail deployments in our CI pipeline.

It might be worth trying other services (like browserstack to compare dependability and performance

So when we run saucelabs tests in parallel with our deployments, the outcome is very helpful for QA, and they can investigate failures manually, or re-run the tests.

Sauce labs is great to use for continuously running automated tests. It has a great UI for seeing your tests run and seeing where they failed. I like that I'm able to watch back the test run to see what happened.

The documentation as to how to run across browsers/platforms or run parallel tests can be much better.

I needed a framework that would run my tests after every time some dev code was merged. Saucelabs is great for that and the benefits of it os the devs themselves can watch back the test runs to see the bugs that were caught.

It's very expensive to do cross browser testing and this provided a good alternative.

Tests look extremely long to run at times and support wasn't great at the time i used it.

Cross browser testing of saas products