Open English Review, Pricing & Features for Businesses | SoftwareAdviser.ai

En lo personal no me gustó la forma de las lecciones porque solo era acomodar las palabras, las clases en vivo no logran estar equilibradas porque hay personas que hablan mucho y no dejan que participen los demas, los textos de lectura se me hicieron muy interesantes.Pero sobretodo estoy muy molesta porque yo pedí que se cambiara mi forma de pago y no lo realizaron, cuando termine me cobraron otro mes más sin autorización, y al pedir mi reembolso porque ustedes tuvieron la culpa de no quitar la tarjeta como yo lo había solicitado, me dijeron que no me pueden reembolsar y que debo trasferir el curso a otra persona. La verdad yo no los voy a recomendar y me quedé muy desilusionada de esta empresa.

Ha sido una excelente experiencia, motivadora ,atractiva y de fácil aprendizaje, estoy muy satisfecha. Gracias Open English.

mi opinión es que vine a darla por que es incomodo que cada rato que ingrese me diga que opine opine opine opine opine opine opine opine que molesto a ver si como ya opine no sale mas el anuncio de todas maneras muchas gracias

Mi hermana quizo cancelar su suscripción y no le hicieron caso. Terminó pagando un año completo y no pudo aprovecharlo. La verdad es que la plataforma no es tan buena, las clases con los profes sí valen la pena.

This course is a scam.The lessons are many and the tests associated with them do not correspond to the content studied. The results of the exams are not available after the presentation of the exams, which implies that there is no constant feedback to work on correcting the failures.Each of the 8 levels is divided into 15 units and these are distributed in an enormous number of lessons (96 lessons on average per level), which present errors of all kinds, from technical aspects such as what is written on each slide, not corresponds to the content of the audio, up to grammatical errors and tests at the end of each unit with similar errors.In order to change levels, it is required to finish the 15 units of lousy content that I have already indicated, complete 12 live classes and accumulate 7 hours of practice. At the end of each live class, the teacher generates a brief review for each student, indicating aspects that should be improved, but I experienced that in some classes this feedback becomes a slogan that the teacher has established before starting the class and it The only thing it does is copy and paste the same comment, regardless of the performance in each class by each student.The mechanism that records the hours of practice is not synchronized correctly and it happens frequently to me that the time I dedicate to practice is always below the time that I actually used in each practice. To carry out these practices, the platform offers, for example, pronunciation practices associated with each level that consist of the presentation of 170 sentences on average, which are distributed 12 modules on average and the student must perform the pronunciation and an algorithm is in charge of Evaluate your percentage of correct answers in each sentence. The problem with this resource is that words that are repeated in the same sentence have a different phonetic indication from each other, despite being the same word. The pronunciation that I have studied in this resource has been transferred to the live classes and they have corrected it for being incorrect, this despite the fact that I keep a record of my performance that at this moment is 95.67% and that the platform does not provides these consolidated data.There are two other resources to carry out practices, which work in a similar way, these are "Common Expressions" and "News" that are oriented to develop the student's reading ability and once each story is read, a brief comprehension test of reading. These resources include a help, which shows the meaning of each word so that if in doubt, you can consult this help and thus "understand" the text and answer the questions, but this help is of poor quality, since each word only it shows the first meaning that appears in the Google translator and this causes that the meaning that the help shows is not the correct one within the context of the reading that is being done. It seems that the technical resource that was designed for this help, used the Google translator directly.Additionally, the platform offers another resource for internships that consists of viewing interactive videos, which are divided into three parts. The first part corresponds to the visualization of the video, the second uses fragments of the video to teach the writing of some words and the third part corresponds to a pronunciation practice. The part of writing in many videos does not work correctly since there is a number of words associated with said practice, but when trying to write them, it only allows access to a lower number, which causes the video to be a pending task and never can be completed. The part associated with pronunciation practice is easily blocked by the repetition that I require to improve my pronunciation and the algorithm that evaluates pronunciation in this resource is very different from that of the pronunciation practices associated with each level, which generates confusion and little progress. In addition to these drawbacks, the time spent on these videos is also not correctly recorded and the sum of all this led me to use this resource very few times.All of the above is supported by a sales process like "The Wolf of Wall Street", since the price is never known beforehand to be able to make a more rational decision about the purchase and a terrible academic advice that in my case the I study 10 lessons per week, which would not allow me to complete the entire course, since despite being classified at level 3 of the 8 they offer, this forced me to take 581 lessons, 90 quizzes and 6 passing exams of each level.